Jump to content

 
Photo

SRTM 3 arc second data

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1
vW Maps

vW Maps

    Contributor

  • Validated Member
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Australia

I'm
curious how well the SRTM 3 arc second data holds up. What's the
largest scale map you've dared to offset print using the data for
shaded relief? I'm thinking of using the data for Australia (about 35?
to 40? south) but am not sure yet at what scale my map should be.

Any experiences you can share? Thanks.

MvW
Martin von Wyss
vW Maps
Publisher of Australian Wine Maps and The NPR Map
twitter: vwmaps

#2
Hans van der Maarel

Hans van der Maarel

    CartoTalk Editor-in-Chief

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,868 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Interests:Cartography, GIS, history, popular science, music.
  • Netherlands

I've
just used it for an area in the Caribbean, mapping an island at
1:50.000. I think it's definately not suited for that, it makes it look
really fuzzy. Client loved it though... It probabely depends on what
other information you are showing on top of it.


Hans van der Maarel - Cartotalk Editor
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics

#3
Martin Gamache

Martin Gamache

    Ultimate Contributor

  • Associate Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 980 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:History of Topographic Cartography
    Topographic Mapping
    History of Relief Depiction
    Thematic Cartography
    Demographic Cartography
    Cartographic techniques, methods, and tools
    Orienteering
    Panoramic & Kite Photography
  • United States

MVW

It
really depends on the terrain. I've seen maps done with it at 1:100,000
that looked fine and have made maps with it at 1:150,000 and 1:200,000
but had to use Russian data to patch holes in it.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

-->