I have several tables separated by country where, between them, only the geography definitions differ. I'd like to merge this data into a single table. I am curious if there is an "industry standard" in defining this sort of thing?
I had in mind to make the hierarchy something like…
Market -> Country -> Region -> Area -> City
For example:
• North America -> USA -> Southwest -> Harris County -> Houston
• Asia -> China -> East -> Jiangxi Province -> Xinyu
• Europe -> UK -> South -> London Area -> Beckenham
Any advice would be greatly appreciated, hopefully I'm not being too vague!
Standard geographic hierarchy
Started by
20 Ton Squirrel
, May 08 2012 12:36 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 08 May 2012 - 12:36 PM
#2
Posted 08 May 2012 - 01:28 PM
I don't think you'll find any standardization outside political divisions, as shown in this Wikipedia table or this article about ISO 3166-2. Natural Earth and perhaps others have indicated countries as Admin-0.
Obviously you could insert your own regions in between as admin-1.5 or the like, but it's probably smarter to use a label such as Sales Regions that makes sense to you and your colleagues.
Obviously you could insert your own regions in between as admin-1.5 or the like, but it's probably smarter to use a label such as Sales Regions that makes sense to you and your colleagues.
#3
Posted 08 May 2012 - 01:58 PM
Thanks for your advice and for the useful links!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account
United States
Back to top









