DB query & Basic Map functions
Posted 20 February 2006 - 07:31 PM
This is my first post. I am pretty new to web design and certainly to dynamic cartography. I am very interested by some of the complicated solutions discussed on this forum, most of which greatly exceed my own needs.
I am currently trying to build a website based on a pretty small dataset of archaeological sites (about 300 churches). I am pretty confident that I will be able to design a good PHP/MySQL database search function to allow for searching by feature (eg list all churches containing X,Y, and Z features). The result of the query should then link to the static HTML page of each site which give all the info on the particular church. (Any criticism of this basic model also very welcome!).
Ideally however, I would like to be able to display the result of the searches on a map to facilitate regional comparison. The way I would like to have it would be for the map to show all 300 sites and then for those ones which match the search query to be highlighted (ie all 300 in grey, and the matching sites in red). It would be nice too if the dots on the maps then linked to the static HTML page of the site in question.
I already have photoshop version of the map - ie layered images which are perfect for publicatishing interesting patterns of my own choosing, but I would love to have a dynamic map dependent on the searches of my website users.
Any ideas? Is my model entirely wrong. Is PHP/MySQL the wrong choice? Would I have to go down the route of Flash? Could Flash performing complex queries of the database?
As you can see, I am a true novice but am very willing to learn!!! Please help.
Posted 21 February 2006 - 02:18 AM
Points on Google Maps, using PHP and MySQL
The second tutorial covers how to use different icons for different groups of objects, but I haven't updated that one to version 2 of the API yet.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org / Twitter: @redgeographics
Posted 21 February 2006 - 05:11 AM
Posted 21 February 2006 - 03:00 PM
Posted 21 February 2006 - 05:54 PM
It still puzzles me why this "open standard" has not been fully adopted/implemented across the world. It seems that this file format has been taken more seriously in Europe. As such, Carto.net is the place to soak-up SVG info.
Posted 21 February 2006 - 08:51 PM
Flash is a scaleable vector format technically but they are not the same.
Owner: Springer Cartographics LLC
Director of Design and Web Applications: ALK Technologies Inc.
Chief Creative Officer: Dashflo.com
Posted 22 February 2006 - 07:09 AM
To be complete one has to admit, that SVG has been on the runway longer than first expected. It´s takeoff has only happened in certain areas. There was a lot of hype going on.
SVG is also a darling of the european scientific cartographic community, CartoNet is one of the "spinnoffs" of this development (ETH Zürich etc.).
Despite all this, I really think SVG has a lot to offer and should be honestly considered, especially for a low budget solution.
Add to that that it´s very easy to generate SVG through MySQl/PHP serverside.
Posted 27 February 2006 - 12:38 PM
Posted 27 February 2006 - 01:09 PM
svg tutorials and here too.
They are not specific to mapping, but will help conceptual understanding.
Flash is a scaleable vector format technically but they are not the same. smile.gif
My intention was not that they are the same - but that they do the same thing (i.e. serving vectors on the web). My understanding is that both SVG and Flash are functionally pretty equal.
I would love to learn more information about the advantages/disadvantages of both in terms of functionality (particularly with respect to cartography).
Posted 27 February 2006 - 04:12 PM
Posted 27 February 2006 - 06:32 PM
I am not so sure that true. I guess I should be more specific and use "SWF" instead of Flash as SWF is the file format (like SVG) and Flash is a tool for creating SWF files.
flash can do so much more than SVG (sorry don't have a list).
I hunted around a bit and here is a good comparison between SWF and SVG. I found another site that has examples of SVG, SWF, and ActiveCGM.
There are a lot of similarities, but it seems to me that SVG is a more technologically advanced file format than SWF. There are drawbacks to each of course but I don't think the water is that clear. Since Adobe now owns Macromedia (and Flash) I guess they hold the cards....
Posted 28 February 2006 - 08:14 AM
The biggest thing against SVG is that it is not supported builtin in at least the most spread browser (Ineternet Explorer)
While still not native, IE comes with the AdobeSVG player pre-installed. Also an increasing number of cellphones come with a native SVGTiny 1.1 player. New Mozilla releases have Native Support, Opera has native SVGTiny 1.1support.
The biggest advantage SWF holds, is the development environment. But SWF didn´t revolutionize the web either. There are very few flashmaps that do anything meaningful.
Strangely Adobe´s own Illy has a craptacular SVG export, if you want to work cartographically.
SVG might not be what it was supposed to (revolutionizing graphic use on the internet), but is always an option, especially for lowbudget solutions.
The fine thing is, you can easily keep your coordinate system just the way it is.
There are a lot of map-specific tutorials on carto.net, including tutorials on serverside map generation.
Don´t ever buy the book:
SVG for Web Designers. It´s crap.
SVG Unleashed (SAMS)
SVG Essentials (O´Reilly)
Posted 28 February 2006 - 08:29 AM
I've used Mapview SVG a bit and liked it (http://www.uismedia..../eng/index.html) this was a couple of years ago, I'm sure the product has matured quite a bit. it allows non-programmer types to export svg ready sites right from an ArcMap project. From a planning and rapid response perspective it was great I could put census maps and data on-line very quickly for people to look at prior to last minute meetings.
The flash vs. SVG debate has been going on for a while now. It seems the most hard stances on the issue are from folks with real vested interest (i.e. skills or products) in either one of the approaches. Because so many cartographers were(are) involved in the development of SVG standards I would think that the format was probably better suited. The only advantage (IMO) that flash has is wide spread adoption. Although now that Adobe owns flash I'm not sure how much of a future SVG has.
Posted 28 February 2006 - 11:23 AM
I have really enjoyed using MapViewSVG in the past too and think the extension is quite powerful.
There are a couple of pretty good third-party add-ons for ArcGIS that do SVG export without any need for customization.
I recently heard the new release of ArcGIS (9.2) will add more support to their SVG export. You can export SVG currently with 9.1 but only the linework is carried over - no data.
ESRI's SVG press release can be found here.
Posted 01 March 2006 - 02:35 AM
I'm not sure how much of a future SVG has.
The 1.2 Spec is in the works, and it looks neat so far. So at least there is progress. And SVG is developed by others than "just" Adobe, all the companies selling user agents/players for example, like BitFlash.
I´m not dogmatic about SVG, it´s just the one I learned first, but SWF can surely fit your bill most of the time. But still there are misconceptions about SVG without need.
I haven´t seen the killer app for maps neither in Flash, nor in SVG, although I´ve seen some pretty neat stuff.
Google´s brute forcing raster tiles through the web is much better right now.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users