Our future in web-mapping-Collaboration?
#1
Posted 02 November 2011 - 02:25 PM
I'm working on a presentation for the up-and-coming PDX Cartography Symposium and I am hoping for a little early feedback. In my presentation I plan to raise the battle cry that cartographers need to become more actively involved in helping to shape the future of web mapping (i.e. multi-scale, multi-layer, real-time, pannable and completely end-user configurable maps...). As Matt Perry my programming colleague mentioned, these future capabilities "...present a different challenge since you don't know what the user will try to create. The possibilities are basically infinite and the 'interactive cartographer' needs to consider them all." With this in mind, during my presentation I'd like to give fellow cartographers a few ways to reach out and get involved with the programmers that are developing the tools that we are more and more depending on in our trade. In other words, I'm hoping that one of the messages that they take away from my talk is that cartographic principles (based off of 2D and single scale maps) need to evolve with the technology. In order for this to happen, we need to work with programmers in order to have a higher standard of cartographic capabilities and functions built into the tools and/or have cartographic voices assist in how the resultant maps will look. Hopefully you, my esteemed colleagues agree with me on this one. If not, please share your opinions! If, however, this makes sound sense to you then please share any suggestions for appropriate forums (obiviously cartotalk will be on the list!), etc that you may know of.
Thanks in advance for comments/thoughts.
Happy Mapping!
GIS Manager/Chief Cartographer
Ecotrust
#2
Posted 02 November 2011 - 02:56 PM
From my perspective most of the worst offenses in web cartography stem not from missing "web cartography standards" as much as ignorance of basic visual communication principles. That said, I think there are special issues for dynamic mapping and there is a role for cartographers there to help establish workable standards. For cartographers it's important to take note of the very different way in which most dynamic maps are used. Traditional cartography looks at information density and tries to find ways of easing the complexity and enhancing the maps message through generalization or abstraction. With the ability to utilize the map in an exploratory mode, where the map reader drills down into progressively detailed layers, there is a need to understand how to successfully mix various data scales and adapt the abstraction process not so much to clarify a message but to emphasize the multi-scale/multi-layer nature of the data.
Wish I had known about the Cartography Symposium. I'm coming up to Oregon in a few weeks to visit family and do a little job hunting and would loved to have attended.
David
#3
Posted 02 November 2011 - 03:21 PM
Mapnik probably tops the list. Polymaps is one developed by stamen design. Or something like OpenLayers. I think it is worth noting that you don't have to be a programmer to volunteer for open source projects...
Cheers,
David
#4
Posted 02 November 2011 - 04:38 PM
Be well,
GIS Manager/Chief Cartographer
Ecotrust
#5
Posted 02 November 2011 - 05:12 PM
Depending on my level of shame, I may or may not post my seminar paper here once completed ; ) but it will probably end on my website by the end of December.
#6
Posted 03 November 2011 - 01:14 PM
Analisa, your lament about the requirement to develop web and programing skills is very familiar! I think we must have similar backgrounds, I think of myself as a digital cartographer but one who works primarily in static and publication mapping (even when dealing with analytical GIS work). I am also seeing an increase in requests to port my knowledge to dynamic or web map applications and have somewhat reluctantly moved in that direction. I see the tremendous opportunity and flexibility in web mapping but the programming requirements remain an obstacle. The rigidity of programming is somewhat antithetical to the creative nature of mapping and that presents an issue for a lot of us I think.
Depending on my level of shame, I may or may not post my seminar paper here once completed ; ) but it will probably end on my website by the end of December.
Definitely sounds like we're cut from the same cloth
cheers!
GIS Manager/Chief Cartographer
Ecotrust
#7
Posted 04 November 2011 - 01:27 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account

No Country Selected
Back to top
United States









