Say, I was just wondering how folks are supposed to use the "ratng" feature of the new Resources area. I see five boxes, which appear to be equivalent to the numbers 1-5, left to right. However, what does that mean? Is "1" good? Bad? The comments feature seems helpful/logical, but I guess I don't understand the rating function. Just to test it out tonight, I gave all six of our firms listed a "2". However, I have no idea what that means. If 1-2 is "bad", it'd be nice if Nick could clear out my "ranking" vote (as to not artificially lower any of our ratings)....although I think I'm the only person to try that feature out on the live site so far. (?)
This is obviously pretty low on the priority list, of course! I'm just curious to know how the whole ratings area is supposed to work....or if it is even necessary.
Thanks!
Derek
Resource Ratings
Started by
Derek Tonn
, Jan 13 2006 12:07 AM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 13 January 2006 - 12:07 AM
#2
Posted 13 January 2006 - 02:17 AM
Logically speaking, I think it'd follow the same lines as the user level blocks. The more, the better.
Hans van der Maarel - Cartotalk Editor
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics
#3
Posted 13 January 2006 - 09:34 AM
Yes, higher is better. I will clear out your votes Derek and try to make some indications as to how the rating system works.
Nick Springer
Owner: Springer Cartographics LLC
Director of Design and Web Applications: ALK Technologies Inc.
Chief Creative Officer: Dashflo.com
Owner: Springer Cartographics LLC
Director of Design and Web Applications: ALK Technologies Inc.
Chief Creative Officer: Dashflo.com
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account
United States
Back to top
Netherlands








