Jump to content

 
Photo

First Illustrator Maps

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1
rmcculley

rmcculley

    Contributor

  • Validated Member
  • PipPip
  • 38 posts
  • Location:Vermilion, Alberta, Canada
  • Canada

Well, these aren't my first illustrator maps, but they are my first illustrator maps since about 1995. My brother is moving from Spruce Grove to Kitimat in a couple of weeks, so I put together a quick map for him.


It is also one of my first attempts at using hillshades on imagery. I'm not completely satisfied with the colours, but not bad for the time I spent on it.

I didn't spend a lot of time on the maps at all, but I did like the control on label placement in illustrator.

Attached File  Kitimat_Summer.jpg   136.74KB   288 downloads

This map is using Modis 32 day composite imagery from August 2005. Elevation data is Canadian Digital Elevation Data 1:250,000 dem's.

Attached File  Kitimat_Winter.jpg   157.68KB   252 downloads

This map is using Modis 32 day composite imagery from December 2004. Elevation data is Canadian Digital Elevation Data 1:250,000 dem's.

#2
BEAVER

BEAVER

    Master Contributor

  • Validated Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  • Location:Middletown, NY
  • United States

What are the black labels? Are those town names? The image quality you posted is really low to see the terrain. Looks very blurry to me.

#3
Hans van der Maarel

Hans van der Maarel

    CartoTalk Editor-in-Chief

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,884 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Interests:Cartography, GIS, history, popular science, music.
  • Netherlands

I agree, could you post a higher-resolution sample? Just a detail of a small area would be enough already.
Hans van der Maarel - Cartotalk Editor
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics

#4
frax

frax

    Hall of Fame

  • Associate Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,310 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Stockholm, Sweden
  • Interests:music, hiking, friends, nature, photography, traveling. and maps!
  • Sweden

what is it that you are trying to present? The travel route, and what the nature would look like on the trip... ?
Hugo Ahlenius
Nordpil - custom maps and GIS
http://nordpil.com/
Twitter

#5
Martin Gamache

Martin Gamache

    Ultimate Contributor

  • Associate Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 980 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:History of Topographic Cartography
    Topographic Mapping
    History of Relief Depiction
    Thematic Cartography
    Demographic Cartography
    Cartographic techniques, methods, and tools
    Orienteering
    Panoramic & Kite Photography
  • United States

A few suggestions and comments (in order of complexity and time investment)

Combining satellite image data and relief can sometimes work and sometimes lead to very muddy results. I think you ended up in the latter. You would be better off using just the MODIS imagery in my opinion. You may be able to rotate the image and and have the map not be North up and get plenty of relief to show up from natural cast shadows. Or you may just want to use the relief data combined with a judiciously chosen hypsometic tinting scheme (I've posted ahout this recently in another thread). Either of these solutions would be preferable to the current approach.

Another option would be to use the MODIS derived landcover product or the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields. Combined with the relief you could get a very nice product. Or you may want to save yourself some work and just use Tom Patterson's Natural Earth dataset. You could download just the landcover data and combine it with your Canadian 250m relief image. That might loook very nice.

Another option if you dont like the MODIS team's classification approach is to classify your own MODIS imagery. MODIS' approach must take into consideration the entire globe and thus can overlook many local biomes/landcover type. A quick ISODATA classification of your scene with local knowledge of the area might lead to a perfectly acceptable landcover dataset.

As it is now I can neither see the relief nor the imagery and I would argue that this is clearly a case where less would be better. since I suspect this is a quick map product for a friend you probably dont want to invest time into option 3, all the other choices are likely as easy to implement as your original work and will yield a much nicer product.

mg




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

-->