Cheaper alternatives for mapping in Illustrator
#1
Posted 22 April 2009 - 04:36 PM
Is Mapublisher the only game in town for importing GIS data into Illustrator? It's a little pricey for my limited needs but I don't know of any other plug-in to Illustrator that can do the same thing with fewer bells & whistles. Any suggestions for me?
-Fritzy
#2
Posted 23 April 2009 - 01:34 AM
#3
Posted 23 April 2009 - 03:28 AM
What GIS software do you have? If you can't export to eps/pdf/ai you can maybe export your layers as CAD files... ? or possible print to a postscript printer, to create an eps file that way.
#4
Posted 23 April 2009 - 06:46 AM
You have to watch what program you export your files into CAD. Taking Manifold as an example while you can import a dwg file you can only export dxf. Now the problem comes when you try to import the file into Illustrator, it fails every time. But I have a work around for that, if you already have FME take it into there & export it out as a dxf, then Illustrator will accept that. But keep in mind FME is an expensive package for the starting cartographer.Fritz (interesting name!)
What GIS software do you have? If you can't export to eps/pdf/ai you can maybe export your layers as CAD files... ? or possible print to a postscript printer, to create an eps file that way.
#5
Posted 23 April 2009 - 09:33 AM
Hi all
Is Mapublisher the only game in town for importing GIS data into Illustrator? It's a little pricey for my limited needs but I don't know of any other plug-in to Illustrator that can do the same thing with fewer bells & whistles. Any suggestions for me?
-Fritzy
Mapublisher is the only game in town for working with GIS data in Illustrator.
#6
Posted 24 April 2009 - 02:37 PM
If you just need to get your theames into Illy to create publication ready maps, all you need to do is export or save from the GIS as a PDF then open in Illy. It will usually come over as one grouped layer but a little bit of effort and you can sperate it all out to sart working with it.
#7
Posted 27 April 2009 - 11:40 AM
#8
Posted 27 April 2009 - 01:43 PM
#9
Posted 28 April 2009 - 02:53 PM
#10
Posted 28 April 2009 - 06:41 PM
Just the other morning, I was wondering why, 20 years in, none of the drawing programs ever introduced any way to attribute the objects. Seems like there are some relatively simple techniques, including the one used by MAPublisher using the comment field in PostScript code, that would open up all sorts of new uses for programs such as Illustrator. The database functions wouldn't need to be terribly complex, if they could be easily linked with Excel or something to do the heavy computing. Both FreeHand and Illustrator introduced attributes to the charting feature, but never let it be used anywhere else.
Good question Dennis. I have a feeling the answer lies somewhere in the fact the user community hasn't been brought along to think that way and therefore never saw a need for it. The usefulness of an attributed object goes beyond what MAPublisher has integrated into Illustrator. You can start with queries, selection sets and go on from there. My impression is that cartographers represent a small, lonely voice in the wilderness compared to the huge "designer" community out there - occasionally, one can make out the cartographic community's voice through the designers' din.
#11
Posted 28 April 2009 - 11:56 PM
I have used 'object data' populated with object ids to connect to a sql server and do some graphic replacement/adjustment based on the data stored externally.
It's not the thing you advertise when selling a graphic software though...
#12
Posted 01 May 2009 - 09:45 AM
Dave
#13
Posted 09 May 2009 - 03:43 AM
I use both, but not as seriously as most around here.Has nobody tried Canvas with GIS by Deneba as an alternative to MapPublisher/Illustrator?
Dave
I prefer Canvas for my work as it handles rasters (geo) and thats a huge plus for me. I know MP has raster plugin but that adds extra to the price.
I enjoy Canvas and believe its extremely underated.
Easy to import and export GIS dat.
Its not AICS3 (why's the '3' look like subscript?) but then AI isn't Canvas either. I'd say it comes down to preferances and intended use and cost.
It does occasionally crash but I have never lost data.
I also have Manifold and the two form a big part of my work (as a surveyor) outside my survey software.
I would recommend it. Its available for a trial and they have been easy in the extended trial period in past.
regards
Richard
#14
Posted 09 May 2009 - 04:21 AM
I use both, but not as seriously as most around here.
I prefer Canvas for my work as it handles rasters (geo) and thats a huge plus for me. I know MP has raster plugin but that adds extra to the price.
Actually, MAPublisher does not have a raster plug-in and relies on Illustrator for handling rasters (though it will let you register a georeferenced raster). Maybe you're thinking of Geographic Imager, Avenza's plug-in for Photoshop.
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics
#15
Posted 09 May 2009 - 05:31 AM
Yes thanks for correction.I use both, but not as seriously as most around here.
I prefer Canvas for my work as it handles rasters (geo) and thats a huge plus for me. I know MP has raster plugin but that adds extra to the price.
Actually, MAPublisher does not have a raster plug-in and relies on Illustrator for handling rasters (though it will let you register a georeferenced raster). Maybe you're thinking of Geographic Imager, Avenza's plug-in for Photoshop.
Richard
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account
Albania
Back to top
Poland
Sweden
Canada
United States
United Kingdom
Australia
Netherlands








