Blank space on maps
#1
Posted 13 November 2008 - 01:26 AM
I come across this every once in a while where a client wants a simple map to cover a single book page or a two page spread - and all of the focus is in the center (not middle) of the map.
#2
Posted 13 November 2008 - 02:51 AM
#3
Posted 13 November 2008 - 03:57 AM
caption? blank space can be very good too.
I agree. If there's nothing to show, there's nothing to show. In ye olde days, cartographers used to put dragons and monsters and stuff in ("because everybody knew they were there anyway"), but we can't do that anymore.
Blank space is great to put other design elements in. A legend, index, captions, locator map etc. Then again, if you're asked to stretch a map to fill an unreasonably large area and adding more detail is not an option, you're in a bit of a dilemma. In cases like that, I usually tell the client about my concerns and see if I can persuade them to go with a smaller map.
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics
#4
Posted 13 November 2008 - 10:43 AM
#5
Posted 13 November 2008 - 10:47 AM
With savage pictures fill their gaps,
And o’er unhabitable downs
Place elephants for want of towns."
Jonathan Swift
Esri
Product Engineer
Map Geek
#6
Posted 13 November 2008 - 11:36 AM
"So geographers, in Afric maps,
With savage pictures fill their gaps,
And o’er unhabitable downs
Place elephants for want of towns."
Jonathan Swift
Hahahahahahahaha! Love it!
We need to find modern equivalents to Monsters and Elephants to fit the gaps... From my experience, clients don't often see that a elongated feature don't easily fit on a square map... (sigh!)
Francois Goulet
---
www.fgcartographix.com :: blog.fgcartographix.com :: http://twitter.com/fgcartographix
#7
Posted 13 November 2008 - 12:56 PM
#8
Posted 13 November 2008 - 02:45 PM
In ye olde days, cartographers used to put dragons and monsters and stuff in ("because everybody knew they were there anyway"), but we can't do that anymore.
Who says we can't?!
#9
Posted 13 November 2008 - 02:48 PM
In ye olde days, cartographers used to put dragons and monsters and stuff in ("because everybody knew they were there anyway"), but we can't do that anymore.
Who says we can't?!
Everybody knows there's no monsters... I guess we'll have to settle for the next best thing: monster trucks!
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics
#10
Posted 13 November 2008 - 03:42 PM
In ye olde days, cartographers used to put dragons and monsters and stuff in ("because everybody knew they were there anyway"), but we can't do that anymore.caption? blank space can be very good too.
Yep - I have a collection of modern day 'sea monsters' such as Bid Laden's cave, etc. I could place in blank spaces - might have to do that more often.
#11
Posted 13 November 2008 - 04:11 PM
I do this a lot when making wall map layouts. Geography is not usually symmetrical.
I think from now on though, I will use elephants instead of insets.. yep. who doesn't like elephants?
g r e g @ c a r t o g r a p h i c d e s i g n . c o m
www.cartographicdesign.com
#12
Posted 13 November 2008 - 06:56 PM
Thanks,
M.
#13
Posted 13 November 2008 - 07:27 PM
#14
Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:42 PM
That said - an inset map or overview map can be used pretty effectively (if you are mapping at a scale that is larger than 1:1).
Oregon Metro - Portland, OR
www.oregonmetro.gov
#15
Posted 13 November 2008 - 09:15 PM
If you are covering a a large area, you could always fill in the gaps with a few insets of city level detail.
I agree with Greg.
Or you could do what old maps did and use a texture or dark color fill for those areas.
Examples from my website:
Tavernier's Description Du Pays Armorique A Pres Bretaigne
Erwin Raisz's Map of the Lower Nile
Texture can fill in white space quite nicely.
Decorative-Maps.com
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account

United States
Back to top
Sweden
Netherlands
Canada

New Zealand








