Had a slight break from my Nez Perce maps, so I took advantage of the time to work on some of my thesis maps. I'm studying the effects of hillslopes on trail erosion (geomorphology). My study sight is Olympic National Park because if its extreme diversity in all facets of science. As a cartographer, this is only one of many maps to come in my figures. That is why I have left off so many labels (they'll be covered in previous maps).
This is a generalized geologic map to help explain what I discuss in my thesis on the geology of the park. My study sites are delineated by watershed (again explained in other maps), and there will be a figure caption when I get to that point.
Is this communicative to you? I feel it is but I am prejudice.
Programs used are ArcMAP 9.2 and CS3.