could it be? thinking of all the natural resources, it seems likely to me.
http://news.bbc.co.u...ope/7005483.stm
nice map included too, although i was a little confused by it.
the greatest map dispute of the 21st century?
Started by
benbakelaar
, Sep 20 2007 09:00 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 20 September 2007 - 09:00 PM
#2
Posted 21 September 2007 - 12:50 AM
I'm afraid things might go wrong there in the next few decades... Now that the ice is melting, the area is becoming more and more interesting for the harvesting of natural resources. Canada and Denmark are already squabbling over a tiny island...
Anyway... by the Russian reasoning, the British Isles are a natural extension of the Dutch mainland, so...
Anyway... by the Russian reasoning, the British Isles are a natural extension of the Dutch mainland, so...
Hans van der Maarel - Cartotalk Editor
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics
#3
Posted 21 September 2007 - 01:01 AM
nitpick: I wouldn't call it a map dispute though, but a geo-political one. It is not like they are arguing on how things are represented on maps...
I know a fair bit about this actually, since my institution is supporting developing countries in stating their claims for the continental shelf for the law of the sea.
I know a fair bit about this actually, since my institution is supporting developing countries in stating their claims for the continental shelf for the law of the sea.
#4
Posted 21 September 2007 - 07:36 AM
frax, i was considering just posting it as a "land dispute", but the more i looked at the map and thought about it, the more i felt that "map dispute" was actually fairly accurate. but i think you are clearly right, it really is a geo-political struggle. it's just funny that lines have already been drawn on "the map", but now are being redrawn by several players.
#5
Posted 21 September 2007 - 08:16 AM
Sea dispute might be better. Or ice dispute (but that might not last).frax, i was considering just posting it as a "land dispute"
#6
Posted 21 September 2007 - 08:37 AM
oops. i was getting antarctica and the artctic circle confused!
http://answers.yahoo...06211410AAUlCiJ
http://answers.yahoo...06211410AAUlCiJ
#7
Posted 21 September 2007 - 10:31 AM
#8
Posted 21 September 2007 - 12:05 PM
nice article...
""
The Danes know that scientific inquiry alone will not determine who gets what in the north. "When we are talking resources, we are also talking politics," says Sander, who predicts that the demarcation of rights to the Arctic will end with a "dogfight at the International Court of Justice in the Hague."
""
interesting, maybe this isn't as big of a deal as i pictured it, if it can be resolved in court.
""
The Danes know that scientific inquiry alone will not determine who gets what in the north. "When we are talking resources, we are also talking politics," says Sander, who predicts that the demarcation of rights to the Arctic will end with a "dogfight at the International Court of Justice in the Hague."
""
interesting, maybe this isn't as big of a deal as i pictured it, if it can be resolved in court.
another more in-depth article about the same topic:
http://www.time.com/...00.html?cnn=yes
#9
Posted 27 September 2007 - 12:07 PM
Canada and Denmark are already squabbling over a tiny island...
I think Canada should declare war on Denmark. I think we could take them. and their beautiful women would make wothwhile booty.
On a more serious note, there is a great article in this month's Harpers Magazine on the issue of Artic ressources
Jean-Louis Rheault
Montreal
Montreal
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account

United States
Back to top
Netherlands
Sweden
Canada









