Outlook vs Thunderbird
#1
Posted 02 February 2007 - 04:12 PM
Now that I have moved to OpenOffice I am happy. I am legally using software, I am saving money and I can get everything I need done with regards to Office software.
I have but one piece of illegitimate software left over on my machines. Outlook 2003. (I think I here someone knocking on the door... It must be the MS police).
I could buy Outlook 2007 for two machines and be done with it, or I could move to Thunderbird (because I run I tight ship by nature, and like to save money were I can).
My question to you all is. Has anyone moved over to Thunderbird from Outlook and was able to live with the change. Or should I just bite the bullet and go out and buy Outlook (so those MS policeman can stop 'haunting' me down).
Thanks
#2
Posted 02 February 2007 - 04:22 PM
http://www.mozilla.o...ndar/lightning/
#3
Posted 02 February 2007 - 05:04 PM
It is going Open Source this year, but you can buy a full version for $20USD right now.
I use Outlook for my day job stuff, but I still prefer Eudora for my day to day and consulting e-mail and it's so darn easy to configure and use multiple e-mail accounts.
#4
Posted 02 February 2007 - 07:50 PM
My question to you all is. Has anyone moved over to Thunderbird from Outlook and was able to live with the change. Or should I just bite the bullet and go out and buy Outlook (so those MS policeman can stop 'haunting' me down).
Thanks
... as a sub topic to make this post a bit more interesting.... what percentage of illegitimate software do you have on your machines....
It depends on how you use your email software. If you use the calendar a lot, and the "daily" overview page, you might miss it.. but you already have gotten away from the Office integration with Outlook, so there's not much more to miss IMO. I never had any issues with Thunderbird, I just missed the pretty fonts in Outlook
#5
Posted 02 February 2007 - 10:01 PM
I second this. I use it at home and work and I love it. The work version is the paid version which includes a pretty effective spam filter (my spam to content ratio is around 20:1 at the moment, and Eudora catches maybe 90% of the spam with very little false junking). The home version has a little advert in the corner, no spam filter, and is free. Not much spam at home (I think earthlink filters it out).I've been using Eudora since 1995 or so and love the application. http://www.eudora.com/
It is going Open Source this year, but you can buy a full version for $20USD right now.
I use Outlook for my day job stuff, but I still prefer Eudora for my day to day and consulting e-mail and it's so darn easy to configure and use multiple e-mail accounts.
The new open source version will be Thunderbird-based.
Head of Production, Hedberg Maps, Minneapolis, MN USA
maphead.blogspot.com
"Life's too short for bad maps"
#6
Posted 03 February 2007 - 01:46 AM
#7
Posted 03 February 2007 - 04:26 PM
#8
Posted 04 February 2007 - 02:35 AM
I find Excel and Access as essential tools in my GIS and data related tasks - I often use those to manage and 'bake' data.
I haven't tried OO, and it may be ok for standard usage, but it doesn't include an Access alternative (as far as I know) and I wouldn't count on the spreadsheet component being as powerful as Excel (almost doesn't count in all situations...)
#9
Posted 04 February 2007 - 03:14 AM
I find Excel and Access as essential tools in my GIS and data related tasks - I often use those to manage and 'bake' data.
I haven't tried OO, and it may be ok for standard usage, but it doesn't include an Access alternative (as far as I know) and I wouldn't count on the spreadsheet component being as powerful as Excel (almost doesn't count in all situations...)
The spreadsheet in OO 2 is rather powerful. Whether it's as powerful as Excel I wouldn't know, because I don't use Office... It works for me though.
The database component in OO 2 (called "Base") is something of a failure. It may be due to my machine or something, but I never really got it to work. I'm hoping for future releases to be better.
Do give OO 2 a try. It's free after all
Red Geographics
Email: hans@redgeographics.com / Twitter: @redgeographics
#10
Posted 04 February 2007 - 10:13 AM
#11
Posted 04 February 2007 - 11:33 AM
I haven't tried OO, and it may be ok for standard usage, but it doesn't include an Access alternative (as far as I know) and I wouldn't count on the spreadsheet component being as powerful as Excel (almost doesn't count in all situations...)
I'm more or less in the same camp as Frax. I'm a big Access user and OO simply didn't offer what I needed. I think OO is great for many average users or those who don't really require the more advanced features. For my needs, I'll stick with Microsoft.
#12
Posted 04 February 2007 - 11:49 AM
Tom, Paul, Ben, Nat, Hugo Hans and Beaver.
On the matter of Outlook (the original tread for this topic
As Beaver mentioned I to am able to do everything I need done with OO. OO does it all for me. (it read Access, Dbase, MySQL etc...).
Please keep the comments coming in. I think that for small to medium size businesses the OO, Eudora, Thunderbird, Sunbird projects are quite interesting.
Think about Beaver's post: 110 copies of OO vs MS .... now how much does that save.... PHP-Apache vs ASP-MSServer etc... and the list goes on.
Cheers,
(my predictions... Bears by 3... but the again it might be Peyton Manning's day)
#13
Posted 20 April 2007 - 10:15 AM
this is an older post but if you're still reading it, you might want to check out GMail for small enterprise. Unlike Outlook and the others, it's a web-based service, which I actually prefer, as you can access it from anywhere. You get to use your own domain name, and can manage up to 25 email accounts...for free. Oh, and the spam guard is excellent
#14
Posted 10 March 2011 - 04:16 PM
#15
Posted 10 July 2011 - 12:30 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account

No Country Selected
Back to top
United States
Sweden
Netherlands
Hong Kong








