Jump to content

 
Photo

Blind Web surfers sue for accessibility

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1
Derek Tonn

Derek Tonn

    Legendary Contributor

  • Validated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 455 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Springfield, Minnesota, USA
  • United States

A bit off-topic for the CartoTalk forum, but an interesting read and something to be aware of for folks who design a lot of their map graphics for on-screen display:

ARTICLE: http://news.yahoo.co...usiness_of_life
Derek Tonn
Founder and CEO
mapformation, LLC

datonn@mapformation.com
http://www.mapformation.com

#2
bchubb

bchubb

    Key Contributor

  • Validated Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 64 posts
  • Location:British Columbia, Canada
  • Interests:Painting
  • Canada

I'm very much a web design novice. For any other "newbies" interested in the subject, here's a link to related W3C recommendations on the subject of accessibilty.

W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines

From 1999, so perhaps there's a newer version?

bryanchubb.ca
My paintings (...and no, my Avatar is Vera by Fredrick Varley)

#3
benbakelaar

benbakelaar

    Ultimate Contributor

  • Associate Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 658 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Brunswick, NJ
  • Interests:maps, information, technology, scripting, computers
  • United States

This site may have more up to date things in their reports:
http://webxact.watchfire.com/

"Bobby"-approved is somehow related to the above site, and is something websites use to show they are handicapped-accessible. There is also federal legislation, I can't remember the number off the top of my head.

[Edit: Ah, it's called "Section 508". I think it only applies to federal agencies and the accessibility requirements for their websites. Also, an interesting link from evolt.org: Why Bobby-Approved isn't Enough - http://evolt.org/art...9278/index.html]




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

-->